Employment unfair dismissal regime

Published

1st June 2026

The Employment Rights Act 2025 and its impact on the unfair dismissal regime
The current qualifying period of service that an employee requires in order to pursue a claim of ordinary unfair dismissal is two years. These rights kick in around a week before the two-year continuous employment anniversary because the statutory one-week notice period is also taken into account. Only employees can pursue claims for unfair dismissal and not workers, and this will not change under the Employment Rights Act 2025.

The ordinary unfair dismissal qualifying period of service has fluctuated over the years and has been generally between one year and two years. It last changed on 6 April 2012 when the qualifying period for ordinary unfair dismissal increased from one year to two years of continuous service. The rule of thumb is that Conservative governments tend to extend and lengthen these qualifying periods of service in favour of employers, whereas Labour governments tend to shorten them in favour of employees.

The current Labour government was originally committed to making ordinary unfair dismissal a day one right as part of its election manifesto commitments.

This is not to be confused with automatic unfair dismissal rights linked to, for example, whistleblowing and health and safety breaches, where there are already day one rights in place.

The elements of the Employment Rights Act 2025, which it was hoped would introduce day one rights for ordinary unfair dismissal, faced significant opposition from the House of Lords and also businesses on its journey through Parliament at the end of last year.

This resulted in the likelihood of a significant delay in the implementation of the government’s key manifesto pledge, and as a compromise, it agreed instead to a six-month qualifying period for ordinary unfair dismissal claims.

At the same time, the government, without prior warning, also removed the unfair dismissal compensation cap.  As a consequence, these changes to the unfair dismissal regime still remain the most impactful of the changes being introduced by the Employment Rights Act 2025.

What exactly is changing and when?

The Employment Rights Act 2025 is going to reduce the qualifying period for ordinary unfair dismissal from two years to six months.  It is also going to remove the current financial cap on compensatory awards (which increased for the last time to £123,543 on 6 April 2026).

These changes are expected to come into force on 1 January 2027.  This means that once the compensation cap is removed, employment tribunals will be able to award compensation which reflects loss of earnings and in full.  Financial losses will include base salary, bonuses, long-term incentive plan awards and employer pension contributions.  The duty to mitigate losses on the part of the employee still remains.

In reality the removal of the compensation cap is unlikely to affect most cases on the basis that very few successful cases reach the current cap. The average unfair dismissal award is around £13,700 and the median is around £6,747 according to the latest statistics issued in September 2025 by the employment tribunal service.

These changes to unfair dismissal laws will only really benefit high earning employees and senior executives.  Currently high-earning employees have little incentive to pursue ordinary unfair dismissal claims because of the financial limitations created by the current financial cap.   Once this is removed, claims for ordinary unfair dismissal will become more attractive to those high earning employees and senior executives.

In addition, we are likely to see exit strategies become much more complex and financially risky as the removal of the cap will mean that employees have greater leverage in any settlement negotiations.

The removal of the compensation cap, along with the reduction in the qualifying period to six months, is likely to lead to an increase in the number of ordinary unfair dismissal claims being pursued both by high earning employees and those whose claims can be labelled as nuisance claims.

These changes to the UK’s unfair dismissal landscape will not affect the obligation on an employee to try and mitigate their financial losses by seeking alternative employment and in taking up such alternative employment and in keeping records of their attempts to find work.

The concept of Polkey deductions also remains relevant, where employment tribunals will still be able to reduce compensation to take into account the fact that an employee would have been dismissed in any event, even if a fair process had been followed, and taking into account any contributory fault on behalf of the Claimant employee.

Conversely the uplift in any compensation of up to 25% remains intact for any employer’s failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.  Equally compensation can be reduced by up to 25% where employees fail to follow the recommended procedures and, for example, fail to raise grievance and where there is significant contributory fault.

Don’t forget as well, that limitation periods for employees to issue any claims for unfair dismissal are also going to increase from three months to six months, giving employees more time to think about and prepare such claims.  The ACAS Early Conciliation period is also still a mandatory requirement before a claim can be presented to the employment tribunal and the early conciliation period doubled from six weeks to twelve weeks back in December 2025.

How can employers best prepare for these changes?

There is no legal obligation on employers to have any form of probationary period in any written terms and conditions of employment.  It is a matter of contract, and we have seen a shift in probationary periods over the years, increasing to six months for most employers who implement them.

The changes in the law mean that from 1 January 2027, employees will have unfair dismissal rights after six months continuous service.  The one-week statutory notice period will also need to be taken into account and so any dismissals will need to take place by week 25 into the period of employment if not before, in order to ensure that an employee cannot pursue a claim of ordinary unfair dismissal.

Accordingly, employers will need to manage probationary periods more proactively, and it is recommended that clear objectives be set from day one of the employment relationship.

This will include having regular meetings with the new employee to discuss performance expectations and any issues, documenting where improvements are required so that if the employee does not pass their probationary period there should be no shocks or surprises.  Contemporaneous notes and records of all such meetings should also be arranged.

It is also recommended that employers implement a non-contractual performance improvement plan, however they will need to be mindful that if the length of the process goes over the six-month period, then the employee will obtain unfair dismissal protections.

It is likely that many employers will opt for a three-month probationary period to err on the safe side, and the time frame may mean that it is not practical to implement a full performance improvement plan.

There is not going to be any transition period for unfair dismissal reform and there are no retrospective provisions, which means that all employees hired before July 2026 will gain ordinary unfair dismissal rights from 1 January 2027.

Employers and HR teams should therefore review their current recruitment practices and any probationary periods and should think about updating any written policies and procedures and performance improvement plans.

Read more here 

Gilson Gray LLP

An award-winning full service Scottish law firm: launched in 2014 and grown from 30 to 130 people in that time. We help our clients with business matters, commercial and residential property and estate agency, personal matters including wills and family law, and dispute resolution.

Back to news